Skip to main content

The Dissonance Dilemma: Are Audiences Turning Away from Modern Music?

Since the dawn of the twentieth century, there has been a prevailing belief that mass audiences are being driven away from what is often referred to as "modern music." But is there any truth to this notion? While it is undeniable that there is an inherent irony in music that challenges listeners, have audiences truly grown accustomed to music that is radically different? Furthermore, why does dissonant music struggle to gain traction and recognition, while the classics of the Romantic period continue to capture hearts? In this blog post, we delve into the complexities surrounding dissonance and its impact on modern music's reception by audiences.

The Challenge of Dissonance: You cannot deny that there exists a certain irony in music that dares to challenge conventional expectations. Audiences have become accustomed to a wide range of musical styles, often embracing the idea that "anything goes" in the realm of music. However, it is important to note that the most dissonant pieces of music seldom receive more than a single performance. Take, for instance, the works of Anton Von Webern, some of which are over a century old. Do amateur musicians frequently perform his compositions? The answer is regrettably no. Professional orchestras, on the other hand, often favor the mid-late Romantic composers, seemingly hesitant to explore the realms of ultra-modern music from the past two decades.

The Role of Media: In the landscape of music dissemination, radio remains one of the most influential platforms. However, producers and broadcasters often shy away from playing dissonant music, believing it to be unfriendly to most audiences. This creates a vicious cycle wherein poor education on dissonant music leads to inadequate media coverage, resulting in unfamiliarity among listeners. Consequently, the music receives a lukewarm reception, piquing little interest, and perpetuating the cycle of poor education.

The Shadow of Romantic Music: It is an arduous task to overshadow the allure of music from the Romantic period. The emotional depth and relatability of this genre have captivated people for generations, creating an unwavering love for its melodies. When contemporary music, often characterized by its esoteric nature, follows something so universally relatable, it faces an uphill battle. The stark contrast in styles may not have been the most prudent approach, leading to a potential lack of enthusiasm among audiences.

While it is tempting to conclude that dissonance has turned audiences away from modern music, the reality is more nuanced. The challenges lie in the intricate relationship between dissonance, education, media coverage, and the shadow cast by the beloved classics of the Romantic period. Breaking free from this cycle requires a concerted effort to foster a better understanding and appreciation of dissonant music. By promoting diverse musical experiences, encouraging open-mindedness, and bridging the gap between audience expectations and contemporary compositions, we can hope for a more inclusive and vibrant future for modern music

Popular posts from this blog

What is Stockhausen's legacy?

Karlheinz Stockhausen is one of the most important composers of the post war era. He is partially responsible for the creation of the post war modernist music.   But what is his true legacy? Was he the leading composer in his field? Did he invent the 'timbralist' idea of generating music from a single sound? Well, he did accomplish that concept with  "Stimmung'' (Voice) which is completely designed around the single chord of a B flat ninth . But he wasn't the first.  Giacinto Scelsi wrote "Quatro pezzi per orchestre" which is based a single note per movement and that work was written in 1959. Quatro pezzi per orchestre - Scelsi I seriously doubt whether Stockhausen knew about Scelsi's achievement when he wrote Stimmung in 1977. Perhaps one of his greatest works  is " Gruppen'' (Groups) composed for three orchestras. Did it change the way we use the orchestra?  He was a pioneer, especially in the early stages of hi

In the shadow of a genius.

Recently, I have discovered a fascinating revelation about the composers we admire so much.  That behind many geniuses, there usually is a predecessor lurking in the background.  It reminds of that often quoted phrase by Picasso A  good  artist borrows and  great  artist steals Now, I am not suggesting that the composers who I mention are stealing peoples' ideas - there is no evidence to support that fact.  However, I am suggesting that the idea of a genius who came from nowhere may not be accurate.  Let's take the case of Ernest Fanelli.  Who? You might ask.  He is a significant but unknown person in the development of impressionism.  He is an Italian born composer living in Paris.  He composed a good deal of 'new' music at the end of the nineteenth century.  His ideas were quite radical; his instrumentation included harmonics, sul pont., he used wordless choruses.  Unfortunately, he wasn't as talented a composer as Debussy and his music wasn'

Helmut Lachenmann

H elmut Lachen mann is relatively unknown outside of Germany.  Nevertheless , h e is a figure wh o is growing in significan ce in modern music circles.  Despite his wide experience, h is lack of broad appeal is, in my opinion, largely d ue to the individuality o f his music.  He is  not easy to categori se in an era which is   dominated by trends and cliches. A simple way of describing his music is... *"musique concrète instrumentale". The notion is the creation of a subtlety of transformation of timbre, a manipulation of a continuum from sound to noise, from pitched notes to pitchless textural exploration, and all that in the sphere of (mostly) purely instrumental music. That means that in Lachenmann's music, there's a world of sound that rivals and even surpasses what electronic and electro-acoustic composers can achieve.  -Guardian. Essentially ,  he is a acoustic composer writing electronic sounding music.  He is somewhere in-between the timbra